The Devil is in the Detail
Apparently, nobody reads online terms and conditions. So why are you wasting your time drafting them properly?…
Apparently, nobody reads online terms and conditions. So why are you wasting your time drafting them properly?…
A very interesting High Court judgment in Ireland has tackled the data protection implications of ISPs sharing data for the purpose of limiting illegal file-sharing…
Read More… from Data Protection and Three Strikes in Ireland
The Digital Economy Act 2010 has now been published…
Clive Freedman reports on a new case that addresses the liability of the operator of a blog with multiple contributors where one of the posts is libellous. To what extent is immunity as an information society service provider available?…
The BIS has issued a new consultation on Online Infringement of Copyright (Initial Obligations) Cost-Sharing and SCL is preparing to respond…
Read More… from Digital Economy Act: Online Infringement and Cost-Sharing Consultation
Julia Hörnle reports on the Court of Justice judgment in the Google AdWords case but questions whether the judgment gives quite as much freedom to Google as some have suggested….
Read More… from Google AdWords: Free Rein to Search Engines?
The Press Complaints Commission has upheld a complaint about an entry by Rod Liddle in his blog for the Spectator….
The High Court has found that a company which indexes and collates media files is liable for authorising infringement. The judgment casts an interesting light on the role of many service providers who claim to be merely passive elements in the copyright infringement process and ‘content agnostic’….
Read More… from Copyright Infringement and Intermediaries: Twentieth Century Fox v Newzbin
Members of the Motion Picture Association had a big win in the High Court this week. And then asked themselves an interesting question….
An action for libel was struck out where the original article was archived and could be read only in the context of later pieces which removed any sting. Moreover, it was held that a publisher could not be liable if a Google search snippet was defamatory when the original material from which it was derived was not….
Read More… from Internet Libel: Archive, Context and Snippets